How to Automate Posting Journal Entries in Accounting

Last quarter, a controller told us she found a missing accrual on day four of close. By then, their team had already posted hundreds of journal entries, so fixing it meant rolling back entries, rerunning reports, and delaying the close. 

We’ve heard this story over and over when speaking with finance leaders. Despite having modern ERPs, journal entry posting is still painfully manual, batch uploads fail, mapping breaks across entities, and late adjustments throw reconciliations off track. As a result, leaders face long nights, frustrated teams, and a close process that drags on longer than it should.

In this guide, we’ll show how forward-looking accounting teams are automating posting journal entries to eliminate errors, save hours, and bring predictability to close weeks.

What is a journal entry in accounting

A journal entry is a record of a financial transaction in the accounting system, created using the double-entry method where every debit has a matching credit.

Journal entries provide a clear trail of business activity. For example, when a customer pays an invoice, you debit cash and credit accounts receivable. 

Where do most journal entry postings break down

1. Duplicate or missing entries

You push a batch file from payroll or billing, and suddenly half the entries don’t land in the general ledger. Now you’re stuck hunting through spreadsheets and bank statements to figure out why payroll expenses don't tie to cash.

2. Manual mapping mistakes

Every source system speaks its own language, but the GL only understands one chart of accounts. 

According to an Airbase survey , 41% of journal entry work is spent fixing errors from manual posting. That means your team spends almost half their time correcting mistakes.

When you’re mapping manually, it’s easy to drop revenue into the wrong cost center. For example, one misclassified line item, and suddenly your departmental P&L is off, and you don’t notice until leadership asks why marketing looks profitable this month.

3. Last-minute adjustments

On day four of close, someone finds a missing accrual. By then, hundreds of entries are already posted, so fixing it means rolling back work, rerunning reports, and pushing the close out another day. 

4. Weak audit trail

You know what hit the GL, but not always who posted it or why. When auditors start asking questions, you’re digging through emails and Slack threads to reconstruct the story behind each adjustment. It’s stressful, and it eats up time you don’t have.

5. No visibility until close

Because most posting is batch-driven, you only discover errors at month-end. By the time mismatches show up, they’ve already snowballed, and instead of analyzing results, you’re stuck firefighting.

Why automate posting journal entries

• Entries are posted to the GL as soon as transactions happen, giving finance teams an up-to-date view of business performance.
• Built-in validation checks catch out-of-balance entries, incorrect account mappings, or duplicate postings before they hit the ledger.
• With fewer corrections, month-end close runs faster.
• Every entry carries context (who, when, why), leaving a clean trail of audit ready books.
• Less time fixing numbers means more time driving strategy.

Key principles for automating journal entries

Accounting tools can save you hours, but only if it’s designed with accounting safeguards. Based on what seasoned accountants look for, these are the non-negotiables:

1. Validation rules

Nothing derails a close like an out-of-balance entry sneaking into the GL. The system should block missing cost centers, unbalanced debits/credits, or wrong dates before posting.

2. Mapping consistency

Each transaction must map consistently across departments, projects, and cost centers. Without this, you risk coding SaaS revenue to services in one month and subscriptions in another, making your P&L unreliable.

3. No duplicates entries

Duplicate payroll or expense entries are a nightmare. Automation must detect and stop re-posts before they inflate results.

4. Audit trail

Every journal entry needs metadata for a clean, ready log. Audit trails capture detailed metadata, such as the preparer, approver, timestamp, and source system, providing a clear, traceable record for auditors. 

5. Approval workflows

Not every entry should be auto-posted. Sensitive adjustments, like revenue cutoffs, intercompany charges, or high-value accruals, need a human review before hitting the ledger. 

How does journal entry automation fit into daily accounting workflows

Why ignoring ERP nuances can break your workflow

NetSuite

Approval workflows can become bottlenecks in NetSuite if every journal entry is routed through a single process, especially during high-volume closing periods, because of batch processing limits. Missing custom fields during importing or automating journal entries is another real risk. If field mapping is not set up correctly, these fields can be omitted, causing incomplete reporting and possible discrepancies.

QuickBooks Online

QuickBooks Online supports importing up to 1,000 rows of journal entries through their CSV import tool at once, but larger pushes reportedly slow down/fail during processing, creating delays especially around month-end accounting periods. 

Xero

Xero’s reporting depends heavily on tracking categories, which function similarly to department or project tags. Accurate mapping is crucial; missing or incorrect mapping leads to unreliable reports. As per Xero documentation, only two tracking categories can be active at any time; this limitation is firm and restricts granular reporting options. Consistency in how these categories are used is critical to maintain data integrity.

Best practices for journal entry automation

1. Standardize templates with your chart of accounts

Aligning journal entry templates with your Chart of Accounts and reporting dimensions (such as department or cost center) reduces rework and ensures consistency from day one.

2. Set up monitoring and alerts

Failed postings or duplicates can derail the close process if unnoticed. Automated alerts allow your team to intervene quickly when issues arise.

3. Engage auditors from the start

Demonstrating how audit trails, approval checkpoints, and data validation are built into automation increases confidence and avoids last-minute questions during reviews.

4. Prepare reconciliation dashboards 

Build reports that show posted versus source transactions before go-live. This gives visibility into whether automation is working as intended and helps catch errors immediately.

How Pontera cut its close cycle by 5 weeks with journal entry automation

Pontera, a New York-based fintech company, was struggling with manual invoicing and reconciliations. Their finance team spent weeks each quarter generating invoices, chasing payments, and manually creating journal entries in NetSuite. 

With Zenskar, they automated billing, payment tracking, and revenue recognition, cutting their close cycle.

Here’s what the workflow looked like before and after journal entry automation:

Impact for Pontera

Streamline accounting workflows with Zenskar

Founded by Apurv Bansal and Saurabh Agarwal, second-time founders with deep experience in accounting and financial infrastructure, Zenskar simplifies and automates complex finance operations:

• Pushes journal entries in real time to your ERP or general ledger (e.g., NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero) with a complete audit trail
  
  
• Tracks deferred, unearned, and accrued revenue automatically, keeping you audit-ready at all times
  
  
• Supports granular reporting of recognized vs. unrecognized revenue at the contract, product, or usage level

During the sandbox testing stage, you can fully configure your environment with contracts, customers, usage data, and journal entries, enabling you to evaluate the platform within the context of your actual workflows.

Book a demo to see how Zenskar can automate journal entries and streamline your entire accounting workflow.

‍