Top 5 Tabs Alternatives Reviewed

Explore 5 leading Tabs alternatives for your business. Compare pricing, features, and integrations to make the best choice for your needs and budget

Book a Demo
See Zenskar in action

Introduction

Tabs is an AI-powered revenue automation platform for B2B businesses. It offers contract ingestion, billing, receivables, payments, revenue recognition, and reporting.

This guide examines Tabs' key limitations and compares six alternatives: Zenskar, Chargebee, Maxio, Stripe Billing, and Zuora. Each Tabs alternative is evaluated based on O2C automation and ease of integration.

Tabs comparison at a glance

Feature
Tabs
Zenskar
Chargebee
Maxio
Stripe Billing
Zuora
Best for
B2B businesses
Modern B2B businesses
SMB to mid market
B2B businesses
SMBs with developer bandwidth for billing
Enterprises
Usage metering
Links usage separately to each product and doesn’t aggregate usage across products or across multiple contracts
Automatically matches available usage meters to contracts & can ingest usage data without product-specific identifiers
Engineering teams must maintain logic that links usage to pricing
terms
To send usage data, engineering team
has to store extra fields in their internal
systems
Developers must store Stripe-specific billing identifiers in their internal
systems to map usage correctly
No usage aggregation, no real-time processing and limited import methods available
Prepaid credits & entitlements
No native entitlements module leading to no way to track credits or prepaid usage
Built-in entitlements to grant credits to customers and deplete balances without writing any code
Supports only quantity-based entitlements natively
No built-in entitlement system
Lacks support for granting custom expiries, rolling over unused units, or
automatically billing overages
Supports prepaid entitlements
Revenue recognition
Cannot push revenue recognition data to ERP; POBs are tied to invoice line items; revenue logic is not configurable
Automates all customer-related accounts; applies automatic adjustments; revenue allocation for UBP aligned with ASC 606/IFRS 15
Accounting capabilities are limited to AR, revenue, unbilled revenue & DR and is tightly coupled with invoices
No support for corrections, granular allocation, or usage-based recognition at scale
Accounting capabilities are limited to AR, revenue, unbilled revenue & DR and is tightly coupled with invoices
Limited to AR, revenue, unbilled revenue, DR; caps at 3,000 revenue schedules per subscription; Zuora RevPro is a separate product so usage data has to be moved between systems
Reporting
Basic reporting module and provides reports which are limited to  revenue waterfall chart, overdue invoices, etc.
Advanced analytics module with out-of-the-box charts (ARR, MRR, churn, revenue waterfall, etc.); flexibility to create custom reports
Revenue reports limited to 100,000 rows can be restrictive in handling high volumes of transactions
Difficulty reconciling AR & generating accurate usage-based MRR/ARR
Limited reporting capabilities
Limited customization, data latency up to 24 hours and no support for multi-entity analytics
Integrations
No Xero integration, limiting usability for companies using Xero for accounting;
ERP integration supports only basic object sync
> 200+ integrations with CPQ/CRM, ERP, Payments, Sales Tax, Data Sources; offers two-way sync
Integrations are limited, one-way for key systems, often unreliable, cost extra ($100–$130/month), and Salesforce integration requires a separate app
Unreliable integrations requiring workarounds, with QuickBooks rarely used due to issues and no support for Salesforce orders
Missing critical integrations outside the Stripe ecosystem
Integrations are available but often require complex customization, leading to costly and delayed implementations
Implementation
Weeks
Quick setup requiring minimal dev involvement
Weeks
Months
Weeks
Months
Pricing
Custom
Transparent, value-based pricing
Starts at $599/month, extra for integrations
Starts at $599/month
0.7% of billing volume + additional fees
Largest
G&A expense by companies

Top 5 Tabs alternatives and competitors

1. Tabs vs Zenskar

Zenskar is an AI-native Order-to-Cash platform, built ground-up to automate finance workflows with intelligent agents and human-in-the-loop reliability.

The software serves finance teams who are scaling fast, but don’t want to scale headcount just for revenue operations.

It automates the entire revenue workflow using intelligent agents, from ingesting contracts to generating invoices, syncing journal entries, and surfacing actionable insights.

Key differences between Zenskar and Maxio

Feature
Zenskar
Tabs
Prepaid Credits & Entitlements
Native entitlements support allows you to manage prepaid contracts seamlessly with built-in entitlements. Grant credits to customers, track usage, and deplete balances without writing code.
No native entitlements module leading to no way to track credits or prepaid usage. No support for prepaid billing.
Usage Metering
Zenskar ingests raw usage data in any format via API, CSV upload, or remote DB connection. Usage is fully decoupled from pricing. Zenskar maps every usage event to the right contract and invoice without needing product-specific identifiers.
Because each product is treated as a separate atomic unit, managing usage across products or at the contract level becomes difficult.
Revenue Recognition
Automates all accounts that deal with the customer side of your business: AR, Revenue accounts, Unbilled revenue, Deferred revenue, Payment gateway expenses and receivables, Gateway payouts, Sales tax payables, Customer wallet liabilities. Handles complex revenue allocation for usage-based models.
Cannot push revenue recognition data to ERP systems. Performance obligations are closely tied to invoice line items and cannot differ from them. Revenue logic is not configurable.
ERP Integrations
Supports deep ERP integrations, including object sync and Journal entry sync. Sync revenue, invoices, payments, and journal entries with platforms like NetSuite, QuickBooks, and Xero.
ERP integration supports only basic object sync. Does not create all journal entries to automate AR, revenue, unbilled revenue, deferred revenue, payment gateway charges, etc. No Xero integration.
APIs
API-first platform. Anything possible in UI can also be done using APIs. Offers simple, user-friendly open APIs. Easy integration with core systems.
Offers a limited set of APIs that are not very user-friendly.
Reporting
Gives complete control to create any chart or report you need for your business through a simple UI. Charts like ARR, MRR, overdue invoices, revenue waterfall, churn reporting etc, are available.
Tabs has a basic reporting module and provides reports which are limited to revenue waterfall charts, overdue invoices, etc.
Customer Portal
Fully customizable self-serve customer portal. Customers can view active contracts, invoices, balances, edit account information, and make payments.
Does not offer a customer portal. Customers cannot manage their billing or subscriptions autonomously.
Usage Alerts
Can set up email usage alerts when customers reach certain usage thresholds. Set up a webhook that your CS Teams can use to take action based on usage status (e.g. provision/de-provision access).
No usage alerts available.

Matt Branard

VP Finance

70% faster month-end closing

"We're able to automate revenue recognition accurately for our value-based billing, reducing the manual hours spent by 70%."

Noy Kalansky

Saved 200+ hours of grunt work

"We're saving 200+ hours/quarter on invoicing and receivables management by completely automating our recurring billing."

Pros

  • Automates billing for subscriptions, usage-based, hybrid, and multi-year contracts
  • Native entitlements management with credit tracking and usage depletion
  • Contract-level flexibility with cross-product logic and minimum commitments
  • Comprehensive revenue recognition automation for ASC 606/IFRS 15 compliance
  • Deep ERP integrations with journal entry sync for NetSuite, QuickBooks, and Xero
  • API-first platform with user-friendly open APIs
  • Advanced analytics module with full billing and revenue data access
  • Fully customizable customer portal
  • Usage alerts with email and webhook notifications
  • Quick implementation within days

Cons

  • No built-in CPQ but integrates with third-party CPQ tools
Zenskar automates billing and rev rec for service-based industries with custom pricing. Source: G2
Zenskar automates billing and rev rec for service-based industries with custom pricing.
Source: G2

2. Tabs vs Chargebee

Chargebee is a subscription management platform optimized for scaling B2B and B2C SaaS businesses. It offers strong automation for standard subscription workflows but lacks native usage-based and hybrid billing support, leading many companies to explore Chargebee alternatives that can handle more complex billing needs.

Chargebee lacks built-in usage-based billing and requires workarounds.
Source: Chargebee

Pros

  • Strong subscription lifecycle automation, including trials, upgrades, downgrades, and renewals
  • 60+ integrations with CRMs, ERPs, and payment gateways
  • Built-in dunning management to reduce failed payments
  • Supports multi-currency transactions for international operations
  • Tax compliance automation via Avalara integration
  • Basic revenue recognition features for standard compliance
  • User-friendly UI with extensive documentation

Cons

  • Lacks built-in usage-based billing; requires workarounds
  • Limited customization for invoicing and templates
  • Reporting lacks depth for MRR and ARR insights
  • Limited analytics on customer cohorts and revenue trends
  • Pricing includes revenue-based fees
  • Enterprise features require higher-tier plans
  • Customer support can be slow for non-enterprise users

3. Tabs vs Maxio

Maxio, created through the 2022 merger of Chargify and SaaSOptics, still functions as two separate systems. Data between billing and revenue recognition doesn’t flow cleanly—usage, invoices, and payments often fail to sync, breaking revenue schedules. As a result, finance teams are stuck manually reconciling records and re-exporting data between the systems, pushing many to explore alternatives to Maxio.

Usage-based, hybrid & prepaid models require workarounds, making Maxio a poor fit.
Source: Maxio

Pros

  • Supports contract-based billing, prepaid subscription tracking, and billing schedules tied to milestones—critical for enterprise deals
  • Includes built-in dashboards for: CAC:CLTV ratios, cohort performance,real-time cash forecasts, and custom revenue reports
  • Includes a native, configurable rev rec engine for B2B SaaS. It handles deferred revenue tracking, contract modifications and expense amortization
  • Offers two-way sync with NetSuite, QuickBooks, HubSpot, and Salesforce. These integrations are purpose-built for finance workflows (e.g., syncing journal entries, tracking deferred revenue)

Cons

  • Usage data must include pricing and contract-level identifiers, requiring engineering teams to embed billing logic into product infrastructure—creating tight coupling and recurring engineering bandwidth
  • Only handles overdue payment retries—no workflow automation for proactive debt collection or custom dunning logic
  • RevRec breaks down with usage-based billing, entitlements, or multi-year contracts. Period locking further restricts accurate restatement of financials
  • Customers report persistent issues with Salesforce, QuickBooks, and NetSuite syncs—often requiring manual edits or duplicate data entry
  • APIs are not as flexible or developer-friendly
  • Slower implementation; longer onboarding timeline

4. Tabs vs Stripe Billing

Updating pricing or rolling out new pricing models on Stripe Billing often demands extensive coordination between sales, finance, and engineering teams. This slows down execution and makes it difficult to respond quickly to market changes, prompting many businesses to look for Stripe Billing alternatives that offer greater flexibility and speed.

Stripe’s invoice customization is minimal compared to competitors.
Source: Stripe Billing

Pros

  • Highly customizable APIs for developers to build tailored billing workflows
  • Supports multiple pricing models including flat-rate, usage-based, and hybrid
  • Seamless integration with Stripe Payments for global transactions
  • Multi-currency support with localized pricing
  • Automated invoicing with smart retry mechanisms for failed payments
  • Robust documentation and community support for developers
  • Straightforward pay-as-you-go pricing (0.7% of billing volume)

Cons

  • Lacks native revenue recognition; requires third-party accounting tools
  • Invoice customization is minimal compared to competitors
  • No built-in dunning automation; relies on third-party solutions
  • Limited reporting and analytics for financial tracking
  • Requires engineering bandwidth for implementation and maintenance
  • Not ideal for companies needing contract-based billing
  • Restricted to Stripe ecosystem limiting flexibility with alternative payment providers

5. Tabs vs Zuora

Zuora isn’t the perfect solution for every business. While it's an established platform for enterprise subscription billing, many growing businesses face challenges with its high pricing, complex implementation, and limitations around support for complex pricing models and contract structures, forcing users to seek Zuora alternatives.

Zuora requires a high degree of configuration.
Source: Zuora

Pros

  • Supports enterprise-grade billing including contract-based, milestone, and hybrid pricing
  • Multi-entity support for large organizations operating in different jurisdictions
  • 40+ pre-built payment gateway connectors for global transactions
  • Automated revenue recognition with ASC 606/IFRS 15 compliance
  • Customizable analytics dashboards for deep financial insights
  • Advanced churn management with predictive analytics
  • Seamless ERP and CRM integrations including NetSuite and Salesforce

Cons

  • Long implementation timelines; setup can take months
  • High total cost of ownership with additional fees for advanced features
  • Requires technical expertise to configure and maintain
  • Customer support varies by tier with priority access only for enterprise clients
  • Complex user interface with steep learning curve
  • Invoice customization is limited requiring engineering workarounds
  • Revenue recognition is not real-time and may require manual adjustments

5 common challenges with Tabs that finance teams face

1. Product-level limitations

Tabs treats each product as an atomic unit, creating limitations when dealing with contract-level features such as minimum commitments or cross-product credit applications. Features at the contract level are harder to implement and often require workarounds.

2. No native entitlements management

 Tabs lacks a native entitlements module, providing no way to track credits or prepaid usage. This absence forces businesses to require engineering bandwidth to support prepaid billing models.

3. Limited revenue recognition capabilities

Revenue recognition is available only within Tabs and cannot push data to ERP systems. The functionality is dependent on the product level, and performance obligations are closely tied to invoice line items without configurability.

4. Basic ERP integration

ERP integration supports only basic object sync and does not create journal entries to automate accounts receivable, revenue, unbilled revenue, deferred revenue, or payment gateway charges. There is no Xero integration, limiting usability for companies using Xero for accounting.

5. No customer portal

Tabs does not offer a customer portal, preventing customers from managing their billing or subscriptions autonomously.

What to look for in the best Tabs alternative?

1. Contract-level flexibility

  • Contract Amendments → Seamless handling of upgrades, downgrades, and mid-cycle changes
  • Native Contract Features → Support for minimum commitments, cross-product credits, and custom performance obligations
  • Multi-Product Logic → Ability to define rules once at the contract level and handle complex scenarios automatically

2. Prepaid credits & entitlements

  • Credit Management → Grant and manage credits without engineering involvement
  • Native Entitlements Module → Built-in support for managing prepaid contracts and credit tracking
  • Usage Depletion → Automatic tracking of usage against prepaid balances

3. Advanced usage metering

  • Format Flexibility → Ability to ingest raw usage data in any format via API, CSV, or database connection
  • Decoupled Usage → Usage tracking independent of pricing models
  • Automatic Mapping → Intelligent mapping of usage events to contracts and invoices

4. Comprehensive revenue recognition

  • Full Automation → Automated handling of all customer-side accounts including AR, revenue, unbilled revenue, deferred revenue
  • Compliance Support → ASC 606/IFRS 15 compliant revenue recognition
  • Real-time Adjustments → Automatic adjustments based on usage and contract changes

5. Deep ERP integrations

  • Journal Entry Sync → Creation and sync of all necessary journal entries
  • Multi-platform Support → Integration with NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, and other ERP systems
  • Two-way Sync → Bidirectional data flow between billing and accounting systems

6. Customer self-service

  • Customizable Portal → Fully branded customer portal for billing management
  • Account Management → Customer ability to view contracts, invoices, balances, and make payments
  • Subscription Control → Self-service subscription and billing management

7. Advanced analytics & reporting

  • Full Data Access → Complete access to all billing and revenue data
  • Custom Reports → Ability to create any chart or report needed for business
  • Pre-built Analytics → Out-of-the-box charts for ARR, MRR, churn, revenue waterfall

8. API-first architecture

  • Comprehensive APIs → Full API coverage for all UI functionality
  • User-friendly Design → Simple, well-documented APIs for easy integration
  • Real-time Capabilities → APIs that support real-time data processing

What makes Zenskar the best Tabs alternative?

Zenskar's contract-level flexibility, native entitlements management, and comprehensive revenue recognition automation makes it the ideal AI-native order-to-cash solution.

To experience Zenskar's AI-native capabilities, you can book a demo or take an interactive product tour.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about the product and billing. Can’t find what you are looking for? Please chat with our friendly team/Detailed documentation is here.

01
What are the best alternatives to Tabs for contract-level billing?

The best alternatives for contract-level billing include Zenskar (for comprehensive contract flexibility), Zuora (for enterprise complexity), and Stripe Billing (for developer-friendly APIs). Zenskar stands out with native contract-level features and cross-product logic support.

02
What are the main limitations of Tabs?

Key limitations include product-level only architecture, no native entitlements management, limited revenue recognition that cannot push to ERP systems, basic ERP integrations without journal entry creation, and no customer portal for self-service billing management.

03
What features should I prioritize in a Tabs alternative?

Essential features to prioritise in a Tabs alternative includes contract-level flexibility, native entitlements management, comprehensive revenue recognition automation, deep ERP integrations with journal entry sync, customizable customer portal, advanced analytics capabilities, and API-first architecture for seamless integrations.